Next: 15. Better Programming Initiative
14. Conflict diagnostic handbook
|
Version / Date of issue January 2003 Name of Organisation Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)/Conflict Prevention and Post-Conflict Reconstruction (CPR) Network resource Author(s) |
Primary purposeTo facilitate the design of a Conflict Diagnostic Framework that enables planners to make strategic choices, and define entry points for response, by assessing conflict and peace factors and conducting a stakeholder analysis. |
|
Intended users Development practitioners seeking to mainstream peace and conflict analysis into their long-term development programmes |
Levels of applicationCountry and regional |
|
Conceptual assumptions The Conflict Diagnostic Framework is based on the assumption that the identification of key indicators / stakeholders, the definition of scenarios / objectives, and the unpacking of strategic issues, together set the stage for a comprehensive (and evidence-based) peace-building strategy. The framework is not aimed at assessing the impact of a particular project on the peace and conflict dynamics in a society nor to fully cover programme implementation issues. |
|
Main steps and suggested process For each step there is a table that needs to be completed, that reflects the components of the analysis in each step.
|
|
Guiding questions / indicators 1. Step 1: Conflict Diagnostic Framework This has a series of assumptions as part of its rationale:
2. Step 2 & 3: Conflict analysis and peace analysis The following guiding questions are used for these two steps:
3. Step 4: Stakeholder analysis The same guiding questions as above, plus the following:
4. Step 5: Scenarios and objectives The guiding questions are:
5. Step 6: Strategic issues and choices The guiding questions are:
6. Step 7: Peacebuilding recommendations Once the recommendations have been identified, they need to be looked at in terms of:
|
|
Required resources The framework is designed to be most useful when used in a workshop setting, and so resources would be required to organise a workshop. |
|
Current applications Three workshops have been held to apply this framework: in Sierra Leone, the Philippines and the DRC. |
|
Lessons learnt 1. Although systematised thinking is required for good conflict analysis and strategy development, the constantly changing nature of conflict is not easily captured in tables and boxes. The use of supplementary devices to enhance understanding (eg conflict trees) is therefore essential. 2. The diagnostic tool is just that - it does not enable good analysis if its users lack a good understanding of the conflict under study, or analytical skills. 3. The tool needs to be adapted for use by different types of actors, eg international development agencies with programmed development interventions, or local NGOs engaging in various activities. 4. In order to ensure high quality analysis and a good strategy, the tool should be applied in a workshop process that brings together key (constructive) stakeholders. |
|
Commentary on the tool None |
|
Available reports The Compendium of Operational Tools can also be consulted at www.acdi-cida.gc/peace for operational tools, best practices and lessons learned. |
|
Contact details Chief, Peacebuilding Unit |
Next: 15. Better Programming Initiative
© FEWER, International Alert and Saferworld, 2003. All rights reserved.
Site design and publishing system by Jez Humble.