Next: Chapter 4: Integrating conflict sensitivity into sectoral approaches
Annex 1
Sample indicators – links between context changes and project, and project changes and context
The following table is provided for the purposes of better understanding what situation-specific interaction indicators might actually look like. The table uses a fictional setting to outline the types of changes that might indicate an interaction between the context and the project, and associated indicators that could be used to better understand these changes and thus the interaction. Note that the sample interaction indicators provided use a combination of objective and perceptive questioning to help triangulate information collection; objective and perception based indicators are discussed in step 3 above.
|
Background Kugan is a poor developing country. The national government is undertaking a road construction project through the northern region to create a trade link with the neighbouring country of Moyag. The road right-of-way has been cleared and levelled, but asphalting has not yet begun. Northern Kugan is a sparsely populated region dominated by pastoralists and cattle herders. There is violent conflict in the adjacent region of Moyag, and arms proliferation in Northern Kugan has become a problem. Another problem is the involvement of Kugan locals in rustling cattle for Moyag-based gangs. |
|
|
Project’s impact on context – are changes in the context linked to the project? |
Context’s impact on project – are changes in the project linked to the context? |
|
Change in profile: Environmental degradation, and in particular, deforestation. Project-related question or suspicion: Is road construction contributing to deforestation? Indicators: 1: respondents who feel the natural habitat has improved/ deteriorated 2: changes in the price of cut wood 3: percentage of road through forested areas. |
Change in project: The road is now being constructed in a straight line and thus at a lower cost. Profile -related question or suspicion: Is there government pressure on pastoralists to surrender land so road can be constructed in a straight line? Indicators: 1: pastoralists’ perception about the benefit of the road 2: changes in real construction expenditures compared to project budget 3: pastoralists’ feelings about the road being a government project compared to other respondents (eg cattle herders). |
|
Change in causes: Increase in small arms proliferation. Project-related question or suspicion: Is road construction facilitating the trafficking of small arms? Indicators 1: number of respondents who feel there has been an increase in small arms proliferation (since road construction began) 2: change in incidences of gun related violence along road 3: number of respondents who feel it is easier/ harder to purchase a gun compared to off-road respondents. |
Change in project: Payroll offices being robbed. Causes -related question or suspicion: Are bandits using increasingly available small arms to rob construction payroll offices? Indicators: 1: incidences of robberies and amount stolen 2: number of robberies that involve small arms 3: respondents who perceive the road building project is not a proper prioritisation of community needs. |
|
Change in actors: Access to education for rural youth. Project-related question or suspicion: Is road under construction already increasing transportation options for rural youth? Indicators: 1: number of youth attending schools accessed by road 2: number of days average student attends one of these schools 3: number of respondents who feel the road has increased access to schooling. |
Change in project: Fuel being stolen from construction vehicles. Actors -related question or suspicion: Are poor cattle herders seeking to derive benefits from road project by stealing fuel from construction vehicles? Indicators: 1: litres of fuel stolen 2: cattle herders’ feelings about expenditure on road 3: change in sales by cattle herders’ traditional fuel sources. |
|
Change in dynamics: Decreased incidences of cattle rustling. Project-related question or suspicion: Is increased access to employment and income undermining the need to rustle cattle? Indicators: 1: change in level of household income on road compared to off road incomes 2: percentage change in households that feel they have better livelihood options 3: change in incidences and number of cattle stolen. |
Change in project: Labour for project has become hard to find. Dynamics -related question or suspicion: Are potential construction workers not seeking employment on the road project because of their concerns about increased insecurity? Indicators: 1: number of vacancies unfilled in road construction jobs 2: percentage of construction workers who ‘feel safe’ working in the area 3: number of construction workers who leave the construction camps at night. |
Next: Chapter 4: Integrating conflict sensitivity into sectoral approaches
© FEWER, International Alert and Saferworld, 2003. All rights reserved.
Site design and publishing system by Jez Humble.